I have three points:
1. HB 160 is not limited to persons near death, with the most obvious reason being that predictions of life expectancy can be wrong, sometimes way wrong. This can be due to medical error (the test results got switched) and because predicting life expectancy is not an exact science. Cf. http://www.choiceillusiondelaware.org/p/nina-shipiro-for-pdf-click-here.html
2. Perhaps more importantly, the six months to live criteria will likely be determined "without treatment" so that HB 160 will apply to people with treatable conditions. This is to the how the Oregon model law is interpreted in practice. A recent report by Fabian Stahle, a Swede, puts it this way:
- Proponents sell the Oregon model assuring us that assisted suicide will only apply to dying people when all hope is lost. It is "completely misleading." https://choiceisanillusion.files.wordpress.com/2018/01/fabian-stahle-article-on-oregon.pdf
HB 160 is worse due to the required falsification of the death certificate to reflect a death due to terminal illness, which gives family members and other predators a "stay out of jail free card." If enacted, HB 160 will create the perfect crime. See http://www.choiceillusiondelaware.org/p/the-bill-will-create-perfect-crime.html
To learn more about problems with HB 160, please go here: www.choiceillusiondelaware.org
Please vote "No" on HB 160.
Margaret Dore, Esq., MBA, President
Law Offices of Margaret K. Dore, PS
Choice is an Illusion, a nonprofit corporation
www.margaretdore.org
www.choiceillusion.org
www.choiceillusiondelaware.org
1001 4th Avenue, Suite 4400
Seattle, WA 98154
206 697 1217